3 ms·
At least for the ones related to trees, it's just a renaming. Below is a link to the PR. When I initially implemented these trees, I chose the names BSTree and
by KyleJune 4y ago
At least for the ones related to trees, it's just a renaming. Below is a link to the PR. When I initially implemented these trees, I chose the names BSTree and RBTree to keep the names short. I'm guessing the person that proposed renaming them did so to make it more obvious what they are.
https://github.com/denoland/deno_std/pull/2400 https://github.com/denoland/deno_std/pull/2400
The standard library is separate from the runtime. It wouldn't break backward compatibility if you were to update. For example, if you were importing RBTree and upgraded Deno to the latest release, it would keep working just fine. You would only really need to switch to using RedBlackTree instead if there was a change made to it that you wanted.
I think the only time you would need to update your standard module imports to be able to use newer versions of the Deno runtime would be if the standard module was depending on runtime APIs that have a breaking change.