4 ms·
That's a lot of money to pay just to get back functionality the previous poster already has.
That's a lot of money to pay just to get back functionality the previous poster already has.
One might argue it’s cheaper than paying for a beefy GPU to do transcoding.
True, unless you already have one..
No need for a beefy GPU - Intel QuickSync on 9th gen is fine - I'm running a Core i3 9100T (25W) part that can take anything I throw at it.
In-house it doesn't do any transcoding to the TV's, only to mobile devices and off-network.
It actually has slightly more features, it can play Dolby Vision and other HDR content that any regular reencoding process chokes on.