2 ms·
(This is a copy of my comment on the original post) For those that say ideas are next to worthless, when you think about why Google search succeeded, do think i
by vdondeti 15y ago
(This is a copy of my comment on the original post)
For those that say ideas are next to worthless, when you think about why Google search succeeded, do think it was because of their execution or because of their idea about the importance of backlinks (i.e. the BackRub/PageRank algorithm). Of course, it is a combination of the two, but it is greatly mistaken to think that ideas are next to worthless. I think Daniel Bobke (commented on original post) has it right, when he commented that a good idea is necessary but not sufficient for success. Bad ideas are a dime a dozen, but good/great ideas are rare indeed. Though at times it is hard to tell if an idea is a good/great idea. I think a truly good idea will motivate you to work hard and as Jake Croston (commented on original post) stated drive you to keep going to find the path to good execution, even if you fail at first. Think about it another way: would you rather work for a firm that had (1) a great idea, but terrible execution or (2) a terrible idea, but great execution? I would work for firm (1) in a heartbeat.
- freemarketteddy 15y agoHow do you intend to prove that Larry Page and Sergey Brin were the only humans who thought of that way of ranking links.? What I can prove is that they were the first humans to come up with a technological system that implements that.