3 ms·
The pushbullet article indicates an appeal succeeding doesn't mean the issue was fixed to the reviewer's liking. So I wouldn't assume the correlation that LTT's
by Arnavion 4y ago
The pushbullet article indicates an appeal succeeding doesn't mean the issue was fixed to the reviewer's liking. So I wouldn't assume the correlation that LTT's appeal succeeded because of what they did. Google's review process seemingly does not comply to logical reasoning.
- V__ 4y agoMaybe, but he talks about sending it in a few times and only after changing the page's loading behavior it got accepted. Therefore, I don't think there were human reviewers involved at all, otherwise why not spell out the problem directly? Would save everyone's time and reduce the number of interactions.
- kmeisthax 4y ago"Your app was rejected because our crawlers refused to read it" is more accurate but makes Google look incompetent - even if there's legitimate reasons for crawlers to not follow redirects or execute JavaScript.
- altfredd 4y agoIt looks like some types of reviews might be lazy: the app is accepted after an automated scan, then placed in queue to let human reviewers check it at later date. This is actually my biggest takeaway from the article.