4 ms·
one XMPP server gets big and usernames get squatted and dealt with at the discretion of the server admin. Only solution is something like how Farcaster does it
by olah_1 4y ago
one XMPP server gets big and usernames get squatted and dealt with at the discretion of the server admin.
Only solution is something like how Farcaster does it where you at least get to keep your public key the same and usernames are optional.
https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol#3-identity https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol#3-identity
Or go the urbit route and make the addresses totally user owned.
- kube-system 4y agoFederate messaging servers and make addresses domain specific. Works fine for email.
- olah_1 4y agoPeople lose their gmail accounts all the time for weird reasons. Maybe you are specifically talking about a world where everyone self hosts their own servers?
- kube-system 4y agoGmail sucks, but not for any reason caused by email the protocol.
- olah_1 4y agoIt is the fault of email, the protocol, yes. If email was better designed, it would not allow these situations to happen. For example, if server operators didn't own your account, there would be no problem. It is a protocol issue.