2 ms·
The FBI desires that you are referencing through Trump have been policy goals since the 80s when source code had to be exported as pages on a book. So it rings
by halJordan 4y ago
The FBI desires that you are referencing through Trump have been policy goals since the 80s when source code had to be exported as pages on a book. So it rings false when you claim he's just another president. You do get into your real reasons at least, but the soapbox betrays the real nugget of the question. Why cant we have a policy discussion because someone must derail it with their absolute need to tell us how badly they disagree with him.
- BuckRogers 4y agoI said I agree with 75% of his policies or more. I'm not sure where you read that I "badly disagree with him". That's a disingenuous take on what I said. I disagree with his methods and disapprove of his lack of character and integrity. It's not worth the win. That said, for an example of the 25%, while I agree with low taxes, I do not agree with tax cuts when already at historical lows as President Trump enacted. Deficit spending should not be supporting any tax cuts. To share just one example outside of that 75% of agreement I have with Trump policies. I would hardly characterize that disagreement as proof that I "badly disagree" with "his" policies. Scarequotes around him because I'm not convinced many of his administration's actions were his ideas. I would characterize him as more of a puppet that dominated the room and was willing to disregard any form of humility or tradition, but did not dominate any intellectual matters such as policy decisions. Any positive change that occurred could only accurately be ascribed to his administration. His criminal actions have nullified, or should nullify all of his support. We're long past the stage of it qualifying as a cult.