3 ms·

> therefore by your logic the only moral choice is to not try to show ads to people No I wouldn't agree with that. I think it's moral to show adverts, but not

• dahart 4y ago
  This isn’t about what you think, your opinion does not define what’s moral. Morality is defined by what the public as a whole agrees with. Today, the public is okay with blocking ads. The public is also okay with showing ads and paid plans too. Therefore, again, this is not a moral issue. But if it was, both the common (public and advertisers) and public expectations alone demonstrate that the less moral choice is to try to show ads to people against their will when they’re consuming content unrelated to the ads. The advertisers have always known this and they are free to not pay for ads and not support the content, but they choose to because ads still work well enough, for better or worse, despite ad-blocking behaviors among people who care enough.
  • chrisseaton 4y ago
    > This isn’t about what you think, your opinion does not define what’s moral. Err that's exactly what my comment was about. I was sharing my opinion on what I think is moral. If you don't want to hear my opinion on it why are you reading the thread? I'm not threatening to codify this into law and enforce it on others if that's what you were worried about lol!