3 ms·
I think most developers would find it easier to contribute to a github/gitlab/gitea project than a ML one. Besides, there are definite downsides to like MLs, li
by robert_foss 4y ago
I think most developers would find it easier to contribute to a github/gitlab/gitea project than a ML one. Besides, there are definite downsides to like MLs, like CI integration and pulling patches to local trees.
Now, there are strengths too. Like being archived easily & having threaded conversations integrated.
- e3bc54b2 4y agoCI can definitely done on mailing lists. The interface is bit worse than PRs, but I'm sure with enough imagination that can be overcome. Pulling local trees has been absolutely better IMO with mailing list. I can literally with single keybinding apply patch to relevant repo, something that takes much longer route with Github. (convert URL to raw.github/whatever, copy and paste to apply, or do clicky-clicky in the Github app or whathaveyou)