3 ms·
Because systemd has moved forward while the alternatives haven't. Systemd is not making the alternatives more difficult to maintain, the alternatives are more
by Avamander 4y ago
Because systemd has moved forward while the alternatives haven't.
Systemd is not making the alternatives more difficult to maintain, the alternatives are more difficult and more difficult to maintain. Matter of perspective, really.
- ddalex 4y agoI disagree - SystemD has the approach of embrace-extend-extinguish, where it gobbles up services and turns them into their own hard dependency - from DNS to device managers, etc It's a very MS approach instead of a UNIX - do one job.
- Avamander 4y agoI don't think you're very familiar about the difference between systemd the project and systemd-* the different services under that project. They're not that coupled together, including the two you've just listed.