5 ms·
From the Key Findings for Electricity:- "Solar PV capacity additions expand from 151 gigawatts (GW) in 2021 to 370 GW in 2030 and almost 600 GW in 2050, while
by tuatoru 4y ago
From the Key Findings for Electricity:-
"Solar PV capacity additions expand from 151 gigawatts (GW) in 2021 to 370 GW in 2030 and almost 600 GW in 2050, while wind capacity additions double to 210 GW in 2030 and rise to 275 GW in 2050."
Yeah, nah. Annual PV capacity production of around 400 GW in 2023 and 1 - 2 TW in 2030, based on publically announced investments. Probably more that Duckduckgo hasn't found for me. I haven't looked at wind, but given what's been in the news recently, 210 GW is low by a factor of five as well.
Looks like they're still using the same broken modelling methods, and the same broken integrated assessment model software.
- baxtr 4y agoIt's amazing how they have been wrong on this and still continue making the same assumptions every single year (see other comment).
- hef19898 4y agoEither they are wrong or they are indirectly predicting the bancruptcy of the PV industry at large. I'd bet at the former, all that additional production capacity will be used one way or another.
- tupac_speedrap 4y agoYeah, to be fair solar PV can be hard to estimate in countries with lots of feed in solar panels because it is decentralised.
- tuatoru 4y agoModule production is quite centralised, with about 80% of it in China, and another 10% or more in South-East Asian countries, set up there by Chinese companies to get around the US tariff imposed in 2019 or so. (Korea produces some of the cells but doesn't assemble modules, AFAIK. Japan, also a few cells.) The Europeans want to re-animate their domestic manufacturing for energy security reasons, after letting it die five or six years ago. First Solar is trucking on in the USA. India has ambitions to expand its production a lot. Not too many other places, to my knowledge.
- pfdietz 4y agoModule production may ultimately become decentralized, for the same reason production of window glass is decentralized: transportation costs.
- iso1631 4y ago> Annual PV capacity production of around 400 GW in 2023 How does that make sense. 400GW Peak? Average? Or are they talking GWh If the IEA can't use the right units in its reports, what hope is there.
- fsh 4y agoThe IEA is using the correct unit. They are talking about "annual solar PV capacity additions" which is measured in Watts.
- badpun 4y agoIt's correct but not very useful, as it doesn't inform about the real energy output (and who cares about the nominal/theoretical output). PV in a desert in US Southwest produces vastly more energy than say PV in Germany.
- cinntaile 4y agoIt's not supposed to measure real energy output, it's about predicting the capacity increase. What the actual energy output will be is a lot harder to predict and there is a lot more uncertainty regarding those numbers. Regular power plants are denominated in the exact same way, even though the actual energy output will be lower.
- fsh 4y agoThe difference is around a factor of two between the US Southwest deserts and the German north sea coast [1]. So tracking installed peak capacity is not an ideal metric, but it is very simple and gets the order of magnitude right. [1] https://globalsolaratlas.info https://globalsolaratlas.info
- Retric 4y agoReal energy output is just one of many possible ways of measuring PV, but it’s even less predictable than number of panels. Fixed installations produce less power per year than 1 or 2 axis tracking etc. Different locations mean different amounts of transmission losses etc. But even the best model is going to get blindsided by politics. Europe would have been well severed by massively investing over the summer in PV to reduce it’s dependence on Russian natural gas. They didn’t do so but I was very much expecting a push for the fastest to install alternative to natural gas turbines which is PV.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tuatoru 4y agoJust want to add that I may be underestimating 2030 production if perovskites take off. Roll-to-roll printing on flexible plastic film is a lot cheaper than refining silicon, slicing it up, and embedding it in glass to make PV modules. The unknowns are all upside risk with PV and wind. Not so much with fossil fuels.
- RandomWorker 4y agoI think they are being conservative with their estimates and being pessimistic on announcements.
- 11101010001100 4y agoPerhaps they are accounting for the China slowdown? PV has flattened in China.