Seems to be overstating the case in some ways, and understating in others. My reading is that this applies to transactions that promote violence, obscenity, et

Seems to be overstating the case in some ways, and understating in others. My reading is that this applies to transactions that promote violence, obscenity, etc. Yes it is indeed awful and deserving of ridicule, but it's not a charge against your non-transaction related activity. So in that sense the headline is overstating the case. I'm only finding pitchfork raising junk sources right now, but anyway those say that this applied to seller activity in the last go-round. My reading of https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/acceptableuse-full https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/acceptableuse-full is that this "now" applies to either side of a transaction. So in that sense, the headline is understating the new problem. That AUP happens to also have a date of 9/21/21 so apparently this has been in effect for over a year. Why isn't that called out?