3 ms·
Except there is nothing but idealism behind the idea that this is true. Indeed, we have AGI already, they are called humans, and the progress we see in the dev
by voxl 4y ago
Except there is nothing but idealism behind the idea that this is true.
Indeed, we have AGI already, they are called humans, and the progress we see in the development of AI is not exponentially explosive. The only exponential growth we've seen (which is necessarily logarithmic growth after some inflection point, actually) is Moore's Law.
- naasking 4y ago> Indeed, we have AGI already, they are called humans, and the progress we see in the development of AI is not exponentially explosive Actually it is. Human population growth has been exponential, as has been our resource use and consumption of our habitat, and the pace of our innovations. We've now created forms of machine intelligence to further augment our own, and machine intelligence could itself start advancing soon, without the messy constraints of evolution and biology. The possibility is definitely there, we'll see if it works out that way in the end. If it does, it will likely blindside us.