3 ms·
I think what they're saying is that you need more code in Go, which is inherently unfriendly to developers, to produce an equivalent output in other languages.
by _AzMoo 4y ago
I think what they're saying is that you need more code in Go, which is inherently unfriendly to developers, to produce an equivalent output in other languages. And to a certain extent that is true, but it disregards the intangible benefits of Go, such as it's balance between simplicity and the ability to make it perform.
- snotrockets 4y agoNo. I'm rephrasing the design intent for the language, as outlined in various talks. For example, here: https://go.dev/talks/2012/splash.article https://go.dev/talks/2012/splash.article