The choice isn't 'nuclear or not' it's '1 nuclear or 2 renewables'. If renewable investment was tripled and you could still wrest more money from the coal lobb

The choice isn't 'nuclear or not' it's '1 nuclear or 2 renewables'. If renewable investment was tripled and you could still wrest more money from the coal lobby then building nukes with that would make sense. Until then it just means burning more coal (which is precisely why it's being shilled so hard). Even then spending money on a sodium ion or iron air battery factory will probably pay off sooner.