3 ms·
When I bought FSD it stated clearly it depended on technological and regulatory advances, so I’m not sure I get the argument that I was a victim of fraud. Also
by joshribakoff 4y ago
When I bought FSD it stated clearly it depended on technological and regulatory advances, so I’m not sure I get the argument that I was a victim of fraud.
Also, I haven’t seen it mentioned here, but the tech does exist and currently you have to demonstrate “safe” (according to their heuristics) driving to get access. I have access, and it more or less does the things they promised, far from perfect (in fact it makes lots of mistakes where I take over for safety), but I fail to see how they promised perfection. My interpretation of the “full” in full self driving was that it handles the full list of maneuvers they enumerated like obeying traffic control and making turns, which it does do today.
- m463 4y agoactually the part where people have to "demonstrate" driving is what really bothers me. You should NOT have to beg permission. This is normalizing a dystopian future, which tesla is also doubling down on with their car insurance
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- pengaru 4y agoThe probe's not limited to FSD claims, from TFA: > The U.S. Department of Justice launched the previously undisclosed probe last year following more than a dozen crashes, some of them fatal, involving Tesla’s driver assistance system Autopilot, which was activated during the accidents, the people said.
- onionisafruit 4y agoI wonder how that compares to the number of accidents where BMW’s driver assistance was activated. BMW seems to be actively trying to kill me by steering into every construction marker it sees.