3 ms·
The distinction between "value" and "growth" isn't clear. You can be both a growing company and trading at a value-like multiple. META more than other big tech
by kypro 4y ago
The distinction between "value" and "growth" isn't clear. You can be both a growing company and trading at a value-like multiple.
META more than other big tech companies has been scaling back significantly this year and were one of the first to do so.
They're also buying back a ton of stock and with operating margins in excess of 80% it's almost insane how conservative they've been with spending money over the years. This is hardly a "growth at all costs" company. This is one of the most profitable companies ever.
META also isn't going "all in" on the Metaverse. They're investing a portion of their cashflows on AR/VR technology. The media is so focused on the headset that I think people are missing the fact that in a lot of ways META is inventing the wheel that will support the AR/VR products of the future. Even if they don't make a success of their Metaverse, their technology will still have real value to the ever increasing number of companies operating in this space.
TL;DR: META is trading as a value stock, they are cutting back, they are returning a ton of profits to shareholders, and they're not going all in on growth or the Metaverse.
- adam_arthur 4y agoTheir expenses are up significantly, there is no cutting back up to this point. A few FAANGs gave lip service to being more frugal, but their earnings releases and operating costs show they were anything but. Part of the reason Meta is crashing is because they are being even more aggressive/spending more on metaverse next year than they previously stated. 19% growth in costs while having -4% revenue over the year ago quarter. https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2022/Meta-Reports-Third-Quarter-2022-Results/default.aspx https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/...
- kypro 4y agoA little late here, but want to say you're correct. I thought they were cutting back on Metaverse R&D a bit, but clearly not.