3 ms·
Wildlife in 'grave danger', biodiversity declined by 69% since 1970, warns WWF
- h2odragon 4y agoShows how effective they've been at their mission so far, doesn't it? I suspect they may have nudged their statistics beyond the point where it can be excused as hyperbole. What is a "species" anymore? Does it often happen that a mother animal gives birth to multiple species in a single litter by their standards?
- barbariangrunge 4y agoI had thought the depopulation was slowing. Apparently not. Can’t imagine this being any ruling party’s political priority with whispers of a recession in the air (I’m sure many will pay lip service) I have no idea what to do about this. It’s such a severe, long term, tragedy of the commons situation.
- djohnston 4y agoNo one cares. Let's throw soup on more Van Gogh's.
- zardo 4y agoWhy the headline change? A population decline is not the same thing as a biodiversity decline.
- thisarticle 4y agoSince when does the World Wrestling Federation care about wildlife?
- DishankZala 4y ago69% decline in areas other than Europe and USA, EU and USA were already lost in 1970.