3 ms·
Note that nobody claimed that they were modern or high tech, but that they were engineered! The article claims how our society is modern and high tech because w
by necovek 4y ago
Note that nobody claimed that they were modern or high tech, but that they were engineered! The article claims how our society is modern and high tech because we are finally engineering stuff in the last few hundred years (where we instead just ran into mechanical and construction contraptions by accident previously?).
I disagree by giving examples of engineering feats from a few thousand years ago.
Btw, for "statues", I was thinking of things like the Great Sphinx of Giza or Colossus of Rhodes (Colossus was of comparable height to the Statue of Liberty).
- robertlagrant 4y agoI understand. I think Dave's conclusion is incorrect as well, but I think he means that most of today's progress in almost every area of life is the result of sustained engineering efforts over the last two hundred years, rather than "there was no cool engineering before 200 years ago".