3 ms·
This is offered very much in a “take it for what you will but for obvious reasons I am not going to give many more details” spirit. I worked for a major player
by TheNewsIsHere 4y ago
This is offered very much in a “take it for what you will but for obvious reasons I am not going to give many more details” spirit. I worked for a major player in cybersecurity back when they were really trying to get everyone onboard with SGX. Our CISO was a technical guy, and worked closely with a peer who had a hybrid academic and professional background in cryptography. They both had strong credentials in mathematics and one was a practicing mathematician at one point.
After a thorough review, all of the stakeholders who reviewed it told the executive leadership not to touch it because their opinion was that it couldn’t offer anything meaningful beyond what we already had in place using the Windows API and it’s interface with the TPM, and they had concerns about what they felt were insufficiencies in the SGX design.
That experience was a bit more in-depth than I’ve detailed here, but the takeaway for me was that Blue was desperately trying to justify a technology that wasn’t what it was hyped up to be.
I’ve often thought IME is the same thing, “different day”.
Edit: typo