3 ms·
From the article: > Aeromine said... the patented system is motionless and virtually silent Edit: This is just a quote from the article! I'm only trying to pr
by tantalor 4y ago
From the article:
> Aeromine said... the patented system is motionless and virtually silent
Edit: This is just a quote from the article! I'm only trying to provide context from the article to the above comment. There's no need to signal your disagreement with this quote by voting on it.
- wongarsu 4y agoJudging by the 30 second clip they show it's motionless in the same sense as dyson's fans are bladeless. The motion and blades are less in-your-face, but still present.
- zardo 4y agoBy motionless they mean something other than "no moving parts" as it has a turbine connected to a generator.
- bushbaba 4y agoIt has motion. The cylinder rotates. All boils down to how long that mechanical part will last prior to needing to be replaced.
- readthenotes1 4y agoImagine if it had no motion! It would appear to fly off at supersonic speeds as it ignored -earth's rotation -earth's movement around sun -solar system's movement around the galaxy -galaxy's drift through the universe (Sorry "no motion" is like a claim out of a Dilbert cartoon)
- yjftsjthsd-h 4y agoWe are obviously operating with the planet as our reference frame.