4 ms·
Huxley said >Not disagreeing that it is an area where Apple should have behaved better So why would you read it as a claim that "it's OK for Apple to do this"
by iy56 15y ago
Huxley said
>Not disagreeing that it is an area where Apple should have behaved better
So why would you read it as a claim that "it's OK for Apple to do this"? He's just pointing out an interesting bit of history.
- untog 15y agoIt's a linguistic thing, I think. Not disagreeing that it is an area where Apple should have behaved better, but The 'but' implies "Not disagreeing, but not totally agreeing either". It might have been better to not mention Apple at all: "It's interesting to note that Rambus persued this tactic in an even worse way..."