4 ms·
What you describe may apply more to writing code, rather than reading code. Of course, knowing syntax is not sufficient for programming, but if you want just to
by leethargo 4y ago
What you describe may apply more to writing code, rather than reading code. Of course, knowing syntax is not sufficient for programming, but if you want just to review existing code, (unfamiliar) syntax may be an obstacle to non-programmer domain experts.
I've read something along these lines about the choice of OCaml at Jane Street, where they argued that their investor-types are able to proof-read new code, despite not being programmers, because the language "reads like english", similar to SQL or COBOL.
- ghostpepper 4y agoCan you really effectively proof read if you're just guessing about the underlying semantics? If the goal is just to give investors a false sense of security then I suppose it achieves that