Unfortunately, I'd need a few more fingers. Not too many though which makes that argument for Cucumber fairly moot. I did work somewhere where each team had 2 t

Unfortunately, I'd need a few more fingers. Not too many though which makes that argument for Cucumber fairly moot. I did work somewhere where each team had 2 testers. One to write the cucumber and one to write the glue code for it. It was about as successful as you could imagine. I'd also say "non-coding" rather than "non-technical". Coding is just one aspect of being "technical". There is benefit in making the tests easy to read but this is better done in actual code, e.g. the screenplay pattern.