4 ms·
Questions about race, like on the Wikimedia Foundation's application forms[1], are completely off-putting for me. But I guess it's working for them: folks trea
by hericium 4y ago
Questions about race, like on the Wikimedia Foundation's application forms[1], are completely off-putting for me.
But I guess it's working for them: folks treating race-based decision making process as racism would not waste Wikimedia's HR staff's time.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33086141 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33086141
- _6hmp 4y agoI went and looked at the application form for the first job linked and this is absolutely standard in the US at every company I've ever applied to. It's not just some Wikimedia thing. It's voluntary to fill it out and the company is not supposed to use it in deciding who to hire. The purpose is to have retrospective data a company can use to make sure they are not introducing bias into their hiring process.
- dragonwriter 4y agoHere’s the EEOC information page on the practice: https://www.eeoc.gov/pre-employment-inquiries-and-race https://www.eeoc.gov/pre-employment-inquiries-and-race From an applicant perspective, while physical tear-off sheets for mail-in applocations (one can imagine hand-delivery setups that solve this) are clearly imperfect, web forms are even worse.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Questions about race, like on the Wikimedia Foundation's application forms Those don’t (oddly enough, given that the voluntary self-identification section for US applicants to support government reporting has a “race/ethnic definitions” expansion block) have a question about race, just gender identity and whether or not one identifies as Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. So its kind of odd to complain about a race question with those as the example.