For all its use of the term time, for example “backward in time” or “does consciousness flow linearly with time,” there is no definition of time itself provided

For all its use of the term time, for example “backward in time” or “does consciousness flow linearly with time,” there is no definition of time itself provided in the article. I had hoped the Definitions section would at least acknowledge some concept of time. I suppose we all collectively agree on some generic concept of a fourth dimension with a strictly forward movement of instances, a progression toward entropy, but if the theory is going to argue temporal transcendance I’d expect a more formal thesis around what time itself is. I’ve picked up this book but yet to read it. It’s on my list when I get the time. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Order_of_Time_(book) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Order_of_Time_(book)