7 ms·

The development of Robot Framework(1) was originally paid by Nokia, but then things happened and Nokia decided not to continue doing that anymore. The main dev

The development of Robot Framework(1) was originally paid by Nokia, but then things happened and Nokia decided not to continue doing that anymore. The main developer of Robot Framework and few companies using RF heavily understood that something had to be done, so Robot Framework Foundation(2) was formed. RF Foundation has membership fees, it arranges RF conferences etc. which allows RF Foundation to pay for the development of RF. I think that is a really good way to fund OSS development. Those companies which benefit the most from it, pay membership fees and gets to vote on the direction of the product. (1) https://robotframework.org/ https://robotframework.org/ (2) https://robotframework.org/foundation/ https://robotframework.org/foundation/

rapnie 4y ago
This is comparable to how Codeberg [0] is organized, which is also based on Gitea and one of the larger contributors upstream. Yet the number of members is tiny in comparison to their person base and growth. According to their latest numbers [1]: > We are hosting 42010 repositories, created and maintained by 34042 users. Compared to one month ago, this is an organic growth rate of +3372 repositories (+8.7% month-over-month) and +2271 users (+7.1%). And further on: > Codeberg e.V. has 246 members in total, these are 175 members with active voting rights and 69 supporting members, and 2 honorary members. [0] https://codeberg.org https://codeberg.org [1] https://blog.codeberg.org/letter-from-codeberg-hackathon-translation-service-more.html https://blog.codeberg.org/letter-from-codeberg-hackathon-tra...
- trevyn 4y ago
  To be fair, they don't exactly make it low-friction to become a member: > Membership fees are debited by means of SEPA direct debit. Please email to contact@codeberg.org for other transfer methods.
  - Semaphor 4y ago
    FWIW, in Germany, that is an extremely convenient way of paying.
    - johannes1234321 4y ago
      Not only convenient, but also cheap. Often free, certainly less fees than PayPal etc.
      - Aachen 4y ago
        Don't non-consumer account holders pay much higher fees? I seem to remember they were okay if you can have a very low transaction cap, but if you need to accept/send many payments, you had to get expensive subscriptions or pay per transaction. Almost certainly still cheaper than literally any alternative, though, since you need that bank account anyway and I will get very much doubt they'd take as big a cut as the paypal mafia.
        johannes1234321 4y ago
        Yes, bank accounts for commercial purpose have different fees, but unless they pick a completely stupid bank it's still multiple orders of magnitude cheaper than any other transfer. Only downside of SEPA is that it is a lot less common outside EU/Europe and then more expensive and instant payment is not really possible (there are some vendors offering solutions ...) but that doesn't seem to be their aim. (Would be: "click here to get a license for a commercial download")
        fragile_frogs 4y ago
        > Only downside of SEPA is that it is a lot less common outside EU/Europe SEPA stands for "Single Euro Payments Area" and was build for the EU/Europe, I don't think it's available outside of Europe.
        Aachen 4y ago
        Can you not just enter an international bank account number (IBAN) into online banking outside of this area? How does transferring money work then, do you need to send couriers with cash or use third parties like paypal? IBAN is the most basic infrastructure I know of, and I've heard that in the past you also had bank routing so this paying via banks (and banks settling it later) can't be new. I should ask my boss how we get money from customers in other countries. As far as I knew we just give them our IBAN, chamber of commerce number for tax reasons, and it just appears in our account.
  - sparqlittlestar 4y ago
    tbf, SEPA direct debit is across the Eurozone a both common as well as easy way of transfering funds.
  - Aachen 4y ago
    That is literally the easiest inclusive way that works beyond a single country's borders. Easier for me would be iDeal, but that's not easier for you unless you're also Dutch. Easier for people in the USA might be credit cards, but those are issued only if you have a credit rating at all and the rating is good (I don't meet the former condition so bank said no), and surely transferring money from anywhere in the world to an IBAN got to be common enough that it's doable and cheap/free in any country with decent payment infrastructure?
    - cinntaile 4y ago
      It doesn't have to be the only way. Add a Stripe, Klarna, Adyen, Paypal... option and you lower the barriers even more.
      - Aachen 4y ago
        As a single system, though, it beats all of them. My mom doesn't have a paypal but she sure has a bank account. More options is always better, especially if you are happy to swallow exorbitant fees from the various systems, but I can very well see why they chose SEPA as primary payment method. I often wish more websites supported it: I don't want to pay more middle men, accept more privacy policies, deal with more crappy websites that break every few months when using an ad blocker, etc. when I'm already paying for a bank account where I can just send money from.
    - smlavine 4y ago
      > Easier for people in the USA might be credit cards, but those are issued only if you have a credit rating at all and the rating is good Debit cards are effectively the same as credit cards for this purpose, paying for things online. Many (if not most) banks and credit unions in the USA will issue you a free debit card upon opening an account, some without even needing to put any money into the account.
    - int_19h 4y ago
      In US, if you have no credit score or a poor credit score, you can still get a credit card by making a collateral deposit with the bank (usually they expect it to be 2x your expected credit limit). And transferring money to random bank accounts outside of the country is rather messy in US. Some banks won't even let you do it online.
  - techknowlogick 4y ago
    Hi, I'm the author of the blog post, but also a member of the codeberg prasidium. Thank you for this feedback I will bring it back, and hopefully lessen the barrier to join.
- throwaccount12 4y ago
  You say "one of the larger contributors upstream" do you have a source for that? Because I took a look at the contributor list, and couldn't find any evidence of that.
  - rapnie 4y ago
    Codeberg maintain their own long-standing fork of Gitea and have members that are also maintainer at the Gitea project. It is the persons doing upstream contributions, not a Codeberg account. Their fork lives here: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/gitea https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/gitea

rapnie 4y ago

This is comparable to how Codeberg [0] is organized, which is also based on Gitea and one of the larger contributors upstream. Yet the number of members is tiny in comparison to their person base and growth. According to their latest numbers [1]: > We are hosting 42010 repositories, created and maintained by 34042 users. Compared to one month ago, this is an organic growth rate of +3372 repositories (+8.7% month-over-month) and +2271 users (+7.1%). And further on: > Codeberg e.V. has 246 members in total, these are 175 members with active voting rights and 69 supporting members, and 2 honorary members. [0] https://codeberg.org https://codeberg.org [1] https://blog.codeberg.org/letter-from-codeberg-hackathon-translation-service-more.html https://blog.codeberg.org/letter-from-codeberg-hackathon-tra...

trevyn 4y ago
To be fair, they don't exactly make it low-friction to become a member: > Membership fees are debited by means of SEPA direct debit. Please email to contact@codeberg.org for other transfer methods.
- Semaphor 4y ago
  FWIW, in Germany, that is an extremely convenient way of paying.
  - johannes1234321 4y ago
    Not only convenient, but also cheap. Often free, certainly less fees than PayPal etc.
    - Aachen 4y ago
      Don't non-consumer account holders pay much higher fees? I seem to remember they were okay if you can have a very low transaction cap, but if you need to accept/send many payments, you had to get expensive subscriptions or pay per transaction. Almost certainly still cheaper than literally any alternative, though, since you need that bank account anyway and I will get very much doubt they'd take as big a cut as the paypal mafia.
      - johannes1234321 4y ago
        Yes, bank accounts for commercial purpose have different fees, but unless they pick a completely stupid bank it's still multiple orders of magnitude cheaper than any other transfer. Only downside of SEPA is that it is a lot less common outside EU/Europe and then more expensive and instant payment is not really possible (there are some vendors offering solutions ...) but that doesn't seem to be their aim. (Would be: "click here to get a license for a commercial download")
        fragile_frogs 4y ago
        > Only downside of SEPA is that it is a lot less common outside EU/Europe SEPA stands for "Single Euro Payments Area" and was build for the EU/Europe, I don't think it's available outside of Europe.
        Aachen 4y ago
        Can you not just enter an international bank account number (IBAN) into online banking outside of this area? How does transferring money work then, do you need to send couriers with cash or use third parties like paypal? IBAN is the most basic infrastructure I know of, and I've heard that in the past you also had bank routing so this paying via banks (and banks settling it later) can't be new. I should ask my boss how we get money from customers in other countries. As far as I knew we just give them our IBAN, chamber of commerce number for tax reasons, and it just appears in our account.
- sparqlittlestar 4y ago
  tbf, SEPA direct debit is across the Eurozone a both common as well as easy way of transfering funds.
- Aachen 4y ago
  That is literally the easiest inclusive way that works beyond a single country's borders. Easier for me would be iDeal, but that's not easier for you unless you're also Dutch. Easier for people in the USA might be credit cards, but those are issued only if you have a credit rating at all and the rating is good (I don't meet the former condition so bank said no), and surely transferring money from anywhere in the world to an IBAN got to be common enough that it's doable and cheap/free in any country with decent payment infrastructure?
  - cinntaile 4y ago
    It doesn't have to be the only way. Add a Stripe, Klarna, Adyen, Paypal... option and you lower the barriers even more.
    - Aachen 4y ago
      As a single system, though, it beats all of them. My mom doesn't have a paypal but she sure has a bank account. More options is always better, especially if you are happy to swallow exorbitant fees from the various systems, but I can very well see why they chose SEPA as primary payment method. I often wish more websites supported it: I don't want to pay more middle men, accept more privacy policies, deal with more crappy websites that break every few months when using an ad blocker, etc. when I'm already paying for a bank account where I can just send money from.
  - smlavine 4y ago
    > Easier for people in the USA might be credit cards, but those are issued only if you have a credit rating at all and the rating is good Debit cards are effectively the same as credit cards for this purpose, paying for things online. Many (if not most) banks and credit unions in the USA will issue you a free debit card upon opening an account, some without even needing to put any money into the account.
  - int_19h 4y ago
    In US, if you have no credit score or a poor credit score, you can still get a credit card by making a collateral deposit with the bank (usually they expect it to be 2x your expected credit limit). And transferring money to random bank accounts outside of the country is rather messy in US. Some banks won't even let you do it online.
- techknowlogick 4y ago
  Hi, I'm the author of the blog post, but also a member of the codeberg prasidium. Thank you for this feedback I will bring it back, and hopefully lessen the barrier to join.
throwaccount12 4y ago
You say "one of the larger contributors upstream" do you have a source for that? Because I took a look at the contributor list, and couldn't find any evidence of that.
- rapnie 4y ago
  Codeberg maintain their own long-standing fork of Gitea and have members that are also maintainer at the Gitea project. It is the persons doing upstream contributions, not a Codeberg account. Their fork lives here: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/gitea https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/gitea