4 ms·
You’re phrasing these things as negatives but ignoring why they will be adopted. Safety. I don’t want to be driving on the road at all, unless it’s for sport o
by Red_Leaves_Flyy 4y ago
You’re phrasing these things as negatives but ignoring why they will be adopted. Safety.
I don’t want to be driving on the road at all, unless it’s for sport on a closed track. Since I must, since this is America and public transportation is not profitable, I want everyone else to driving the safest vehicles possibly affordable. That lane drift sensor has prevented numerous distracted drivers from causing accidents with their negligence. Opting out of the sensors is more directly reckless than emissions defeating devices on diesels.
- djbebs 4y agoIf you want that, you're welcome to pay for it yourself. I dont think lot of people would reject an offer to replace their cars with a newer and safer version. But thats not why you want, is it? What you really want is for someone else to pay for your desires.
- Red_Leaves_Flyy 4y agoI think you’re projecting and arguing in bad faith with this comment. Perhaps you should read the site guidelines.
- djbebs 4y agoPointing out the raw reality of the policies you're advocating for isn’t arguing in bad faith, its merely demonstrating that the rethoric you're using is disguising an entirely different reality. If I am incorrect about what I pointed out, please point out what exactly I am incorrect about so I can review and correct. If on the other hand i misunderstood your argument, then please feel free to clarify it to reflect the specifics of what you propose. I am happy to engage on the actual facts and the underlying realities of those facts.