This post, like almost every other on the subject, misrepresents the content of the testimony being cited, and thus the arguments being made. Please read it you

This post, like almost every other on the subject, misrepresents the content of the testimony being cited, and thus the arguments being made. Please read it yourself if you care about having discussion any more sophisticated than "Apple is the Great Satan!"/"NO U!" (Edit:"Reading primary sources is heresy! Downvote! Downvote!")