5 ms·
This looks great, but I feel like calling this a successor to Webpack in its current state is disingenuous, considering the roadmap literally says: “Currently,
by thatswrong0 4y ago
This looks great, but I feel like calling this a successor to Webpack in its current state is disingenuous, considering the roadmap literally says: “Currently, migrating to Turbopack from Webpack is not yet possible.”
At least the marketing website is snazzy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- RussianCow 4y agoIndeed. Calling it a "spiritual" successor would have been more honest.
- adammarples 4y agoHeir apparent maybe?
- josefdlange 4y agoNot to mention explicit language about _not planning to support the Webpack API 1:1_...
- ohbtvz 4y agoIt's led by the creator of webpack, and they are working on an incremental migration path. What more would you expect? If you want to keep the exact same API, stay with webpack...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]