3 ms·
I am glad that we agree that “pollutant” is relative to outcomes. I appreciate you amending your previous statement that “pollutant” is just a word referring to
by braingenious 4y ago
I am glad that we agree that “pollutant” is relative to outcomes. I appreciate you amending your previous statement that “pollutant” is just a word referring to anything but the high school textbook reference list of expected atmospheric gases. It is an indeed silly view that no dictionary, encyclopedia or academic paper states. It’s so silly that to hold such a position consistently would essentially mean that “daytime” is meaningfully “a period marked by light pollution” since the normal state of the universe is darkness. Imagine having such a useless and meaningless definition of “pollution”!
I have a couple more questions!
If you hosted an indoor buffet and you needed to keep the chafing dishes warm, would you opt to burn ethanol or (if it were cheaper) the shredded remains of takeout containers?
and
Why does burning plastic have black smoke and ethanol not?