3 ms·

Yeah, coverage (or rather 100% - coverage) is basically a lower bound on what's not tested.

• masklinn 4y ago
  Even "coverage" is not enough, what 100% coverage? Lines? Branches? Paths?
  • Macha 4y ago
    That's my point, coverage (whatever your chosen metric) can only prove the absence of tests, not their presence e.g. if your coverage is 80%, then you know (100-80)% = 20% is definitely not tested since it never even ran in your tests. It doesn't tell you much about the 80%