3 ms·
I have had the pleasure of contributing to a couple different networked drivers with very talented maintainers that I like to use as references. One supports a
by caleblloyd 4y ago
I have had the pleasure of contributing to a couple different networked drivers with very talented maintainers that I like to use as references.
One supports a wide array of Framework versions and has both Sync and Async I/O, as it must to implement the ADO.NET database driver interfaces. Reading the internals really highlight the way that .NET has evolved over the years and what must be done in each target version to maximize performance:
https://github.com/mysql-net/MySqlConnector https://github.com/mysql-net/MySqlConnector
The other supports .NET 6 only with Async I/O only. This support policy seems to be the way that "modern" .NET development is headed, as .NET 6 will be the floor for LTS .NET (formerly .NET Core) releases in a few months. Async APIs only greatly simplify development, and make it simpler to remain performant when targeting WASM.
https://github.com/Cysharp/AlterNats https://github.com/Cysharp/AlterNats
As a library maintainer, one thing I often wonder about is how to indicate .NET version support. One option would be for the major version of the library to track the major version of .NET, so if I were to publish a new library today then start with .NET 6 support and start with version number 6.0.0 instead of 1.0.0. This would limit the library to only making breaking changes when the .NET version changes though.
- TillE 4y agoUnless you're being paid by customers with specific needs, or targeting some weird platform, my expectation would be that libraries don't support old .NET versions an instant longer than Microsoft does. So .NET 6 support can be dropped in late 2024, and I don't think that kind of thing even requires a major version bump. The old framework is dead.