> but what about all the other architectures that only have a C compiler and do not want/can't to depend on LLVM? They either don't compile the rust code, whic

> but what about all the other architectures that only have a C compiler and do not want/can't to depend on LLVM? They either don't compile the rust code, which is fine, or they wait for gcc support. > What about the billions poured into LLVM that made writing an optimizing Rust compiler possible in reasonable time, that is still written in C++? I'm not sure what you're asking here. > Lastly, I hope to be wrong on this, but watching at Google history being backed by them is, unfortunately, a course, Also unclear on what this statement is about.