3 ms·
> that’s a huge, separate discussion. I don't think so. It's basically just the tragedy of the commons. Most workers are responsible and a 20-30 minute nap/wal
by boppo1 4y ago
> that’s a huge, separate discussion.
I don't think so. It's basically just the tragedy of the commons. Most workers are responsible and a 20-30 minute nap/walk break would make them more productive. 20% will abuse it endlessly.
- hinkley 4y agoI think some would think they are abusing it and discover they benefit from it. Someone who doesn’t nap at work gets home to find Season 3 of Ted Lasso has landed, stays up to watch it because they can just nap at work if six hours of sleep turns out to be a bad idea. But then they have a good afternoon because of the nap and decide to try it again.
- hrbf 4y agoI hear this argument repeatedly. What’s missing is the question _why_ said people do this. I feel it’s not sufficient to lump them together under “some people are leeches” and be done with it. I’d argue that if they had a meaningful responsibility, they wouldn’t bug off.