I don't know if you're being ironic or not, but I do find tat substantially plausible. Sounds more plausible than all the hi-tech everybody is suggesting iran h

I don't know if you're being ironic or not, but I do find tat substantially plausible. Sounds more plausible than all the hi-tech everybody is suggesting iran has. I understand that most of the people in here are from California, NY or some advanced european country. Being a citizen of a not so developed european country, I would remind you that not every country has high tech at its disposal. Iran is a rather undeveloped country and it is governed by a rather radical form of islam, resourcing to all sorts of primitive oppression and practices which is everything but inovation friendly. Sure it puts a lot of money in its weapons and it has a lot of inhabitants, but I doubht if it has the capability to develop technology to electronically hijack a high-tech spy device. That would require a solid education system, capable of producing a fair amount of qualified personal and a whole technologically-enabled society. I am yet to see technological or scientific advances coming from iran. It would be very unlikely that all the highly trained people would be working for the army. It doesn't make sense. Now there's something fishy with this whole thing. Sounds to easy and too advanced for iran. I don't really buy it that the US just sent a drone that was hijacked. Millions and millions of dollars thousands and thousands of people working full time on this and then it would just 'have a malfunction' and simply be captured... Nah, I have no idea what really happened, but all this sounds rather naive to me.