It was clear what your response was about, however it was incorrect. Not only did you provide the wrong test for the wrong cases, cases after that 1919 case use

It was clear what your response was about, however it was incorrect. Not only did you provide the wrong test for the wrong cases, cases after that 1919 case used the bad tendency test, up until the 1969 case moved to incitement to imminent lawless action. It's not true to say that anything was upheld due to imminent danger before 1969. If you're going to correct others for misstating the facts and reasoning of US Supreme Court judgements then I think it only fair that others may do the same to you.