I think most of the authors of opne source code only care that their code is being stripped of credits, not that it's being used. It's not a lot to ask. If i

I think most of the authors of opne source code only care that their code is being stripped of credits, not that it's being used. It's not a lot to ask. If it IS somehow an impossible technical challenge that this commercial entity can't manage, but they still want to persue the potential of this technology, they are free to pay other commercial software developers for licences that grant this usage explicitly just like any other commercial use/redistribution license. If that pool of software is too small to be as useful, and too expensive to be practical, so what? Tough shit. I see no reason to excuse how they are currently just not even bothering to do either option, or address the issue in any other way, and are simply outlaw right now.