3 ms·
> For example, the possibility for its users to directly manage the algorithms to which their account will be subjected. This does not make any sense. The prob
by phailhaus 4y ago
> For example, the possibility for its users to directly manage the algorithms to which their account will be subjected.
This does not make any sense. The problem with social media isn't just "algorithms", it's their entire designs. TikTok's swipe-based UI and powerful editor incentivizes short-form video content that builds off each other. That creates certain social behaviors unique to TikTok. Another example: Twitter's decision not to have a "dislike" buton has a huge effect on how tweets are boosted. You can't "manage" that no matter what decentralized protocol you come up with, because that's baked into the UI.
Not to mention, what does it even mean to "choose your algorithm"? Once you give me your data, you have no control over what I do with it. The only thing you can really choose is what piece of data you give away, but the article as it stands doesn't really make sense.
- warble 4y agoIsn't this 'choose your algorithm' mean the client app chooses, and the federated system is more of just a database / data feed? Maybe my really quick overview of the AT stuff missed the point however. This would mean your comment about the UI is more up to the user/client app, so this stuff is up for conversation. Unlike tiktok.
- phailhaus 4y agoThat would make a lot more sense, and is a really interesting idea. One massive content feed from all of humanity. There's definitely going to be all sorts of issues to solve (like the fact that The Blockchain Does Not Forget).