3 ms·
> Sure, and having a drink is invariably the first step to drunk driving. That doesn't make having a drink = drunk driving. Well yeah, but it sure as hell ain'
by CPLX 4y ago
> Sure, and having a drink is invariably the first step to drunk driving. That doesn't make having a drink = drunk driving.
Well yeah, but it sure as hell ain't orthogonal.
If you see a bunch of people sitting around drinking heavily at a bar with their cars parked outside and someone says hey what does any of this have to do with drunk driving you might raise an eyebrow.
Kind of like when you see a bunch of people who are supposed to be in direct ruthless competition with each other sharing lots of detailed price information.
The link you posted just reinforces my point that this is also how the law tends to look at these things.
- tqi 4y agoIt's orthogonal because as the article clearly states, you can have wage fixing with or without sharing wage info. The agreement (ie collusion) and or competitive harm is the crux.