3 ms·
I disagree. 2 years is often enough to see whether design/approach has failed and what were the implications. Unless you're doing very specific things like pr
by tester756 4y ago
I disagree.
2 years is often enough to see whether design/approach has failed and what were the implications.
Unless you're doing very specific things like programming language design, operating system design, then why would you need e.g half of decade to figure out what went wrong?
So, whether X years is enough is dependent on what are you doing.
SpaceX? probably it isn't enough,
web dev? probably it is.
- shalmanese 4y agoYeah, but insights occur in parallel. Let's assume that you get the moment of insight 2 years after a initiative launch and you launch one new initiative every 6 months. After 2 years, you've seen one insight or 0.5 insights/year. After 3 years, you've seen 3 insights or 1 insight/year. After 5 years, 7 insights and 1.4 insights/year. 10 years, 17 insights, 1.7 insights/year. The rate asymptotes but there's still significant benefit for a tenure of 3 - 5 years.