4 ms·
VeraCrypt. The VeraCrypt FAQ addresses your concern: https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/FAQ.html https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/FAQ.html Direct link to audit: https://b
by runjake 4y ago
VeraCrypt.
The VeraCrypt FAQ addresses your concern: https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/FAQ.html https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/FAQ.html
Direct link to audit: https://blog.quarkslab.com/security-assessment-of-veracrypt-fixes-and-evolutions-from-truecrypt.html https://blog.quarkslab.com/security-assessment-of-veracrypt-...
- NoBreakfirst 4y agoYes. Very crypt as adhoc encrypted folders I then move them around and versions them with git ( the version is not incremental, I just know if it’s the same hash .. )
- johntash 4y agoAre you running git outside of the encrypted container? Or are you running it inside (versioning decrypted files)? If you are doing the former, I used to use git-annex[1] for a similar purpose and liked it to keep track of where the encrypted versions of files are stored. [1]: https://git-annex.branchable.com/ https://git-annex.branchable.com/
- NoBreakfirst 4y agoOutside, I’m versioning blob or encrypted data. I’m doing that for my password ( using the awesome “pass” cli ) And some pdf with PPI. Picture are backup non encrypted so It’s around 100mo since years. Checking… Less; 78mo. But git annex look nifty! The use case is large file? Correct ?
- unstatusthequo 4y agoThe general digital forensic community switched to VeraCrypt for encryption evidence in transit via common carrier. So I agree on this.