3 ms·
> “If you’re looking at this from a monetary perspective, then content moderation AI can’t compete with $1.80 an hour,” Carthy said, referring to a typical wage
by nojvek 4y ago
> “If you’re looking at this from a monetary perspective, then content moderation AI can’t compete with $1.80 an hour,” Carthy said, referring to a typical wage for content moderators based in the global south. “If that’s the only dimension you’re looking at, then no content moderation AI company can compete with that.”
I didn't realize human labor was that cheap. I assume Teleperformance is taking a decent chunk of $1.8/hr. 15 seconds to view each video = 240 videos/hr.
On AWS, p4d.24xlarge is $32/hr with 8 A100 GPUs or $4/A100 GPU hr.
> “The human brain is the most effective tool to identify toxic material,” said Roi Carthy, the chief marketing officer of L1ght, a content moderation AI company.
The learning on my end, is better cheaper computer vision would be able to alleviate human traumatization. The flip side is we'd also be able to generate 1000s of human traumatizing videos.