4 ms·
Well, OK, except that there’s an infinitely long-lived bystander risk to not purging asbestos from all use. You could (for instance) argue that once the produc
by highwaylights 4y ago
Well, OK, except that there’s an infinitely long-lived bystander risk to not purging asbestos from all use.
You could (for instance) argue that once the product exists, and is in place, it poses no further risk to anyone - this is a common suggestion but is demonstrably, dangerously false. It’s a rock, it never breaks down. Its state never changes over mortal timescales. Eventually a building, or a rocket, or a train will be refurbished or scrapped - and when that happens people in the area are at no less risk than they ever were.
- iseanstevens 4y agoI think in the case of a non-reusable rocket being launched into space there could be an argument for it, assuming extreme precautions at installation and some calculation/precaution in case the rocket fails in atmosphere. It could even lower the net asbestos on earth :) (not /s, though I attempting to add humor)