> being an ex-hindu doesn't immeditely mean anything to me I suppose that depends on the age group. Among Indians, a person's religiosity isn't so easily disce

> being an ex-hindu doesn't immeditely mean anything to me I suppose that depends on the age group. Among Indians, a person's religiosity isn't so easily discernible to me when they are in their 20s. That's the age when most people are generally just having a good time. But with anyone in their 30s or above, their religious values are easily seen. These values play a big role in whether they marry, whom they marry, how they raise kids, the historical figures they revere, the roles of men and women, the assumptions they hold as true, shared greivances, etc. I have more in common with my Chinese and irrelegious European friends than I do with Indians of any religion. I have more in common with my ex-Muslim and ex-Christian Indian friends than I do with my Hindu family. I don't have much in common with the global left either, who seem to be god-less but not religion-less. One manifestation is the kind of topics I must nod along on, lest it provoke an argument or a fight.