What response am I baiting, exactly? I am challenging the contents of the post. If I misunderstood the author's intentions when they said > That is why you see

What response am I baiting, exactly? I am challenging the contents of the post. If I misunderstood the author's intentions when they said > That is why you see the feminizing of men. Talking about your feelings, etc. This doesn't work for men. Action works for men. They have eliminated most sources of action then the author has failed to communicate effectively. Because on face value, this claim is unfounded, uncited and frankly sexist. > The bottomline is No, let's not shift discussion away from that which I objected. I objected to OP's sexist rhetoric. I don't care about the bottom line, if everything above it is invalid. > The only implication "feminizing" has here, is that women are not nearly as punished for prioritizing talking as a strategy as men are. Source? Anyway, I asked OP to clarify their comment and I will wait for OP to do that instead of letting someone else re-interpret their words.