4 ms·
> “Performance with Volterra has been refreshingly fast. We have run Actipro’s x86-based product installers, and they all worked. Our WPF and WinForms controls
by carlamengo 4y ago
> “Performance with Volterra has been refreshingly fast. We have run Actipro’s x86-based product installers, and they all worked. Our WPF and WinForms controls all work well with no changes, even the ‘API-heavy’ ones, as does all test collateral.” – Boyd Patterson, Senior Software Engineer, Actipro Software
I just thought the same, but not WPF native on arm?, but an emulation layer?, still looks very promising.
- DaiPlusPlus 4y agoWPF on .NET 6 is native-on-ARM64 now, apparently: * https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102341/0400/WPF-and--NET-6 https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102341/0400/WPF-and-... * https://github.com/dotnet/wpf/issues/1817 https://github.com/dotnet/wpf/issues/1817 * https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/net-july-2021/#windows-arm64 https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/net-july-2021/#windows... > Windows Forms and WPF are now supported on Windows Arm64. We added support for Windows Arm64 with .NET 6 Preview 1 and have since backported it to .NET 5 (with 5.0.8). Windows Forms and WPF work the same on Arm64 as they do on x64. You could already use x86 emulation to run Windows Forms and WPF apps on Arm64, however, there was a performance cost to doing so. With this release, you can your apps natively with full performance.
- carlamengo 4y agoCool, thanks you for the links. I somehow missed that.