Was that meant to hold a poor tone? I imagine once it's explained, it's understood, it's a simple thing. I can also understand why certain people would think c

Was that meant to hold a poor tone? I imagine once it's explained, it's understood, it's a simple thing. I can also understand why certain people would think coarse language encompassing the identity/ownership of a state, which was at the centre of a violent conflict in our lifetime, may be worth correcting in an effort to use more precise and up-to-date terms. It's a little complicated for historical reasons, it can't seriously be that hard for you to accept though, now that it's been explained to you?