3 ms·
I have never heard that expression used unironically. I feel like the idea that there are people out there saying it in earnest is itself a meme that was never
by Negitivefrags 4y ago
I have never heard that expression used unironically. I feel like the idea that there are people out there saying it in earnest is itself a meme that was never true.
- mark_undoio 4y agoI believe it's the origin of "bootstrapping" as a verb, in which it immediately becomes unironic technical jargon. i.e. as in getting a start-up off the ground or, when shortened further, "booting" a computer.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI think you're correct about the origins. That said, a typically ironic idiom can still give rise to non-ironic derivative words.
- bena 4y agoI don't think it's entirely non-ironic. I think the term acknowledges the inherent risk in the situation. You are attempting something statistically impossible. So many of these ventures do not pan out.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI think we are obviously quibbling, but that's okay. I think it's not about risk but the meaning is simply making something from nothing, or making much from very little. I don't think booting my computer is inherently risky or statistically impossible
- bena 4y agoSorry, I was referring to the term bootstrapping with regards to startup companies. I agree that in reference to computer startup, it's just being cheeky.
- jakereps 4y agoYou’ve never heard of a bootstrapped startup? On this site?
- Bakary 4y agoThe term itself is not sarcastic but the concept acknowledges the inherent sarcasm of it, since the chain of programs must have an initial mover
- s1artibartfast 4y agoAt least according to a few internet sources, it was in initially invented as a critique with the irony intended. Over time it became idiomatic speech for initiating something difficult
- jlawson 4y agoIt can and is used with both opposite meanings. The same as how "literally" means both "literally" and "figuratively", depending on the context.
- dllthomas 4y ago> The same as how "literally" means both "literally" and "figuratively", depending on the context. I disagree with that analysis. It's true that "literally" is often used when the modified phrase is figurative, but that's not quite the same thing is it meaning "figuratively" - were we to remove the "literally" the utterance would not be more likely to be interpreted as literal. The role it's serving is as an intensifier, and I contend that it's a fairly ordinary example of hyperbole. In the same way, when someone says "you left me waiting for days" we don't say that sometimes days means a handful of minutes depending on context, but that sometimes people exaggerate. (And I recognize that at least one sufficiently respected dictionary disagrees with me; I think they got it wrong.)