Having switched from a classic EU home (concrete) to a new one (wood frame) I can say: - now I feel the homes without a VMC, BUT wood based homes are (far) mor

Having switched from a classic EU home (concrete) to a new one (wood frame) I can say: - now I feel the homes without a VMC, BUT wood based homes are (far) more dusty than concrete based one; - humidity and temperature controls are better, but they eat energy, and they play well with renewables only in the sunny days. Long story short: something is improved, but that's FAR from the "pure mountain fresh air inside as outside. Not only: for those who live in cities, but in general for everyone, filtrating fine particulate (at the maximum home tech available, electric filtration) do something but not more than something, just try look at skin/dress regularly between cities and nature to spot the difference. The modern model push the idea of a home like an isolated environment where people live inside, and that's nice to a certain extent, but we live on Earth not on a sci-fi starship, witch means we ALSO live outside and outside, also in nature, it's not necessary ideal for us all days long in an year. So, better avoiding the idea of the perfect paradise, improving with a realistic vision, without exaggerations like those who are scared by a socket nearby the bed because it might emit a certain EM field but the smartphone no, MUST get super-good signal, Gb+ WiFi, ... Est modus in rebus.