> Not using a tool because people might not know the tool already is an interesting take I guess it would, that's not what I said though. Most programming lang

> Not using a tool because people might not know the tool already is an interesting take I guess it would, that's not what I said though. Most programming languages use symbols already visible and available on your keyboard without having to do anything extra. APL uses a bunch of symbols you either need to learn a new keyboard combinations to enter, or otherwise extra software you probably haven't used before unless you're a mathematician. > I'm learning one right now and that's a task much harder than learning some APL glyphs I agree. Learning new complex glyphs is probably easier than new complex concepts, but what's for sure is harder is learning both at the same time rather than just one. Using a language like Python or any other mainstream language would at least make the person not have to worry so much about new symbols, but mostly just new concepts.